Clinical condition of prosthetic bed tissues in patients who use different adhesive means to improve fixation of removable dentures

Authors

  • В. Ю. Редушко
  • Т. М. Дмитришин
  • О. М. Рожко

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2020-1-96

Keywords:

complete removable plate prosthesis, mucous membrane of prosthetic bed, atrophy state, adhesive

Abstract

Introduction. Despite the prevalence of the use of adhesive means to improve the fixation of removable dentures, the peculiarities of the choice of these remedies, depending on the clinical condition of the tissue of the prosthetic bed, have not been sufficiently studied.
Objective: to study the clinical status of prosthetic bed tissues in patients who use complete removable plate prostheses and various adhesive means with a view of developing recommendations for their selection.
Material and methods. In the study of the clinical status of prosthetic bed tissues in patients who use complete removable plate prostheses (CRPP) and different adhesive agents, 40 patients were examined. In the analysis of subjective and objective dental examination, attention was paid to the state of atrophy of the alveolar process and part, the mucous membrane of the prosthetic bed (MMPB), the type of adhesive means, the nature of sensations in the oral cavity.
Results. The use of adhesive means in 82.5±6.0 % of patients increased the comfort level of using CRPP, and 17.5±6.0 % used adhesive means without knowing the name and without the advice of a doctor. Clinical conditions of the oral cavity of patients who used adhesives were as follows: in 39.5±7.3 % of patients had atrophy of alveolar process of the upper jaw of II type by Schreder, in 52.9±7.9 % of the examined patients had atrophy of the collar part of lower jaw of II type by Keller. The state of MMPB – 2 grades by Suplye was diagnosed in 55±7.9 % of patients. In addition, 70.0–7.2 % of patients complained of dry oral cavity, and 80.0±6.3 % observed a soft and firm plaque on the removable prosthesis.
Conclusion. Noting the prevalence of adhesive means use, the presence of complex clinical conditions in the oral cavity, the impact of the type of adhesive means on the prevalence of inflammatory process, we emphasize the lack of clear clinical and laboratory indicators on the optimal choice of means to improve fixation of removable dentures in the existing market.
Key words: complete removable plate prosthesis, mucous membrane of prosthetic bed, atrophy state, adhesive.

Author Biographies

В. Ю. Редушко

В.Ю. Редушко – аспірант кафедри стоматології післядипломної освіти Івано-Франківського національного медичного університету.
Здобувач наукового ступеня кандидата медичних наук.
Адреса для переписки: вул. Галицька, 2 кафедра стоматології факультету ННІПО, м. Івано-Франківськ, 76018.
Домашня адреса: вул. Г. Мазепи, 167/5, кв. 20, м. Івано-Франківськ, 76000. Е-mail: ddm1972@ukr.net.

Т. М. Дмитришин

Т.М. Дмитришин – д-р мед. наук,
професор кафедри стоматології післядипломної освіти Івано-Франківського національного медичного університету.

О. М. Рожко

Рожко О.М. – канд. мед. наук, доцент кафедри ортопедичної стоматології Івано-Франківського національного медичного університету

References

1. Atassi M, Milleman KR, Burnett GR, Sanyal S, Milleman JL. A randomized clinical study to
evaluate the effect of denture adhesive application technique on food particle accumulation under dentures.
Clin Exp Dent Res [Internet]. 2019; 1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.168
2. Yanishen I, Pogorelaya A, Sidorova O. Rezultatyi klinicheskogo izucheniya effektivnosti
primeneniya spetsialnyih kremov dlya fiksatsii syemnyih plastinochnyih protezov. Dentaklub. 2016;
2: 58–60. [In Russian]
3. Verbovska RI, Rozhko MM, Divnych TIa. Vplyv adhezyvnykh zasobiv na tkanyny rotovoi
porozhnyny v patsiientiv z povnymy znimnymy plastynkovymy protezamy. Halytskyi likarskyi visnyk.
2012;19(4):16-20. [In Ukrainian]
4. Movchan OV. Adhezyvnyi material dlia pidvyshchennia fiksatsii znimnykh zubnykh proteziv:
porivnialnyi analiz yakosti ta kvalimetrychna otsinka. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi medytsyny.
2015; 15 (3). 38–42. [In Ukrainian]
5. Grasso JE. Denture adhesives. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 721–733
6. Gupta R, Luthra RP. Denture Adhesives: A Review. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences.
2012; 4: 85–87
7. Oliveira Junior NMd, Mendoza Marin DO, Leite ARP, Pero AC, Klein MI, Compagnoni
MA. 2018. Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm
formation by single- and mixed-species. PLoS ONE 13 (10): 0203951
8. Mihaylenko TM. Oral cavity hygiene in persons using adhesive products to improve the
fixation of removable dentures constructions. The Pharma Innov J [Internet]. 2015; 3 (12): 64–67.
Available from: ttp://www.thepharmajournal.com/archives/2015/vol3issue12/PartB/3-12-11.pdf/
9. Polyzois GL, de Baat C. Attitudes and usage of denture adhesives by complete denture
wearers: a survey in Greece and the Netherlands. Gerodontology. 2012; 29: 807–814
10. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Hyperzincemia from ingestion of denture
adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 2010103: 380–383
11. Zhang F, An Y, Roohpour N, Barber AH, Gautrot JE. Hydration dependent mechanical
performance of denture adhesive hydrogels. Dental Materials. 2018; 34 (10): 1440–1448
12. Scully Crispian. Oral and maxillofacial medicine: the basis of diagnosis and treatment
(2nd ed.). Edinburg: Churchill Livigstone. 2008. 201–203
13. Joludev SE, Marinkova ML, Kosorukov NV. Gigiena polosti rta u lits so syemnyimi zubnyimi
protezami i nekotoryie sposobyi ee uluchsheniya. Panorama ortopedicheskoy stomatologii.
2005; 3:36–38. [In Russian]

Published

2020-03-24

Issue

Section

PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY