Experimental and Clinical Methods for Assessing the Primary Stability of Dental Implants: Current Capabilities and Future Prospects (Literature Review)

Davud Sergey Ashrafov; Ilham Gasanaga Mehmani; Narmina Azad Gurskaya

doi:10.33295/1992-576X-2026-1-52

Authors

Davud Sergey Ashrafov Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8824-6464
Ilham Gasanaga Mehmani Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2072-7944
Narmina Azad Gurskaya Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1262-6294

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2026-1-52

Keywords:

dental implants, primary stability, osseointegration, assessment of implant stability, resonance frequency analysis, ultrasound analysis, experimental approaches

Abstract

Abstract. The success of implant-supported prosthetic treatment largely depends on primary stability, a critical determinant of successful osseointegration. Evaluating implant stability together with the condition of the surrounding bone enables clinicians to anticipate the integration process and detect potential complications during healing and bone remodeling. Modern clinical approaches include instrumental and imaging diagnostic techniques, such as resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and Periotest measurements; however, their objectivity and applicability in routine practice remain a matter of ongoing debate. In addition to established methods, experimental and less widely used hardware-based approaches are actively being investigated, allowing quantitative evaluation of implant–bone interactions and measurement of stability parameters in physical units. Among these technologies, ultrasound analysis is considered promising, as it enables comparison with histomorphological data on osseointegration and provides objective quantitative measures of primary implant stability.
Purpose: to evaluate current methods for determining the primary stability of dental implants and their correlation with objective indicators of osseointegration, specifically bone–implant contact (BIC), as well as to identify the potential for their clinical application.
Materials and Methods. For this review, a targeted search of scientific publications was conducted in three recognized international databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering recent years. The search employed a combination of keywords related to the topic, including dental implants, primary stability, osseointegration, and implant stability assessment. Articles were selected based on strict criteria for relevance to the review topic and scientific merit. A total of 21 sources were included in the final analysis, comprising both review articles and original research. Each publication underwent a qualitative assessment, focusing on relevance, methodological rigor, and the novelty of the reported findings. This approach provided a comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of current methods for evaluating the primary stability of dental implants.
Results. Analysis of the literature indicates that resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and Periotest can be used to assess implant stability at various stages of osseointegration, but their precision is limited, and they do not fully capture either the mechanical or biological aspects of integration. Experimental methods, including ultrasound diagnostics, electromechanical impedance, and laser testing, provide more objective results expressed in physical units and demonstrate correlation with bone–implant contact (BIC), making them promising tools for clinical and research evaluation of both primary and secondary implant stability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dhahi, A. Y., & Bede, S. Y. (2024). Evaluating dental implant stability using three devices Osstell®, Periotest®, and AnyCheck®: a clinical study. J Oral Med Oral Surg, 30, 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2024023.

Maria-Pilar Quesada-García, et al. (2009). Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis: a review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 14(10): е538-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.14.e538.

Zanetti, E. M., Pascoletti, G., Calì, M., Bignardi, C., & Franceschini, G. (2018). Clinical assessment of dental implant stability during followup: what is actually measured, and perspectives. Biosensors, 8(3), 68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bios8030068.

Shim, J. S., Kim, M. Y., An, S. J., et al. (2023). Evaluation of implant stability according to implant placement site and duration in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Med, 12(15), 5087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155087.

Daniel Rodrigo, Luis Aracil, Conchita Martin, & Mariano Sanz. (2010). Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival: a prospective caseseries study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 21(3), 255–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01820.x.

Semenzin Rodrigues A., Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto C., Januzzi, M. S., dos Santos, D. M., & Goiato, M. C. (2023). Correlation between Periotest values and implant stability quotient (ISQ): a systematic review. Biomed Eng / Biomedicines Technik, 69(1), 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2023-0194.

Bischof, M., Nedir, R., Szmukler-Moncler, S., Bernard, J. P., & Samson, J. (2004). Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res, 15(5), 529–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.x.

Samer Al-Jetaily, & Abdullah Alfarraj Al-Dosari. (2011). Assessment of Osstell™ and Periotest® systems in measuring dental implant stability (in vitro study). Saudi Dent J, 23(1), 17–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.09.003.

Reynolds, I., Winning, L., & Polyzois, I. (2023). A threeyear prospective cohort study evaluating implant stability utilising the Osstell® and Periotest™ devices. Front Dent Med, 4:1139407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2023.1139407.

Effects of detailed insertion torque and RFA values on implant stability: timedependent changes in implant stability and the predictive value of early RFA. J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2025; (in press). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106537.

Hakan Bilhan, Altug Cilingir, Canan Bural. (2015). Evaluation of the reliability of the Periotest for implant stability: an in vitro study. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41(4), е90-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00303.

Diaz-Sánchez, R. M., Delgado-Muñoz, J. M., Serrera-Figallo, M. A., et al. (2019). Analysis of marginal bone loss and implant stability quotient by resonance frequency analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 24(2): e260-e264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22742.

Chen, M. H., Lyons, K., Tawse-Smith, A., & Ma, S. (2019). Resonance frequency analysis in assessing implant stability: a retrospective analysis. Int J Prosthodont, 32(4):317–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6057.

Ilser Turkyilmaz & Edwin A McGlumphy. (2008). Impact of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health, 8, 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-8-32.

Meredith, N., Alleyne, D., & Cawley, P. (1996). Quantitative determination of the stability of the implanttissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 7(3), 261–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x.

Turkyilmaz, I., Sennerby, L., Tumer, C., Yenigul, M., & Avci, M. (2006). Stability and marginal bone level measurements of unsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res, 17(5), 501–505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01261.x.

Fischer, K., Bäckström, M., & Sennerby, L. (2009). Immediate and early loading of oxidized tapered implants: a 1year RFA and radiographic analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 11(2), 69–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00096.x.

Miyamoto, I., Tsuboi, Y., Wada, E., Suwa, H., & Iizuka, T. (2005). Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability. Bone, 37(6), 776–780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.019.

Sennerby, L., Persson, L. G., Berglundh, T., Wennerberg, A., & Lindhe, J. (2005). Implant stability during experimentally induced periimplantitis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 7(3), 136–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00057.x.

Gedrange, T., Hietschold, V., Mai, R., Wolf, P., Nicklisch, M., & Harzer, W. (2005). Evaluation of RFA for orthodontic palatal implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 16(4), 425–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01134.x.

Pearce, A. I., Richards, R. G., Milz, S., Schneider, E., & Pearce, S. G. (2007). Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater, 2007;13:110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v013a01.