The effect of microstructure of the surface, the design and dimension of dental implants on their stability and the process of osteointegration during immediate and delayed implantation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2021-3-58Keywords:
frequency resonance analysis, damping, stability, osteointegration, fixation, implants, periotestometry, immediate implantationAbstract
Abstract. This article presents the results of a clinical study of the stability and process of osteointegration implants of 11 known implant dental systems. The effect of the microstructure of 3 types of implant surface (HSTTM, SLA and RBM) and their design features (shape, size, type of carving) on the indicators of their stability and osteointegration process during immediate and delayed implantation with immediate functional load is shown and analyzed. The stability of the implants and the dynamics of the quality of osteointegration were determined by the devices «Osstell Mentor» and «Periotest» in the process of treatment, starting from the moment of implant installation in different eras (2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months). 414 patients between the ages of 20 and 70 were monitored. Of these, there are 249 and 165 male women. The average age of the operated patients was: for men – 54 years for women – 49 years. All patients were divided into two groups of the first – 109 patients who after extraction were directly implanted into the hole of the remote tooth with the subsequent immediate load, the second group – 305 patients who were delayed implantation with immediate load. A total of 1,302 implants were installed. The study revealed a link between the type of surface of the implant, primary stability and the time of its osteointegration during certain periods of clinical observation. The results of the study demonstrated the important role of combining microstructure of the surface, design and dimension features, the type of insertion of implants on their primary stability and the process of osteointegration in the conduct of both immediate and delayed implantation.
Key words: frequency resonance analysis, damping, stability, osteointegration, fixation, implants, periotestometry, immediate implantation.
Downloads
References
Elise G, Zuiderveld A, Henny JA Meijer, Ajian Vissink, Gerry M Raghoebar. Immediate placement and privisionalization of an implants after removal of n impacted
maxillary canine: two case reports. // International Journal of Implants Dentistry. 2015. – 1. – P. 13–19.
Naves MM, Maezes HH, Magalhaes D. Effect of microgeometry on the surfacetopography of dental implants. // International Journal of implants Dentistry. 2015. –
(4). – P. 789–799.
Cervino G, Romeo U, Lauritano F. Fem and von mises analysis of Osstem dental implant structural components: evaluation off different direction dynamic loads. //
The Open Dentistry Journal. 2018. – 12 (1). – P. 99–239.
Sencimen M, Gulses A, Ozen J, et al. Early detection of alterations in the resonance frequency assessment of oral implant stability on various bone types:
A clinical study. // J Oral Implantol 2011. – 37. – P.411–419.
Hulton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY, et al. Factors related to success and failure rate dental implants. A systematic review. // Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. – 23. –P. 767–774.
Jeong MA, Kim SG, Kim YK, et al. A multicenter prospective study in type IV bone of a single type of implant. // Implant Dent. 2012 – 21. – P. 330–334.
Simune A, Strnad J, Kopecka D, et al. Changes in stability after healing of immediately loaded dental implants. // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010. – 25. – P.1085–1092.
PolsaniLaxman Rao, Amreena Gill. Primary stability: The password ofintegraion. // Review article. - 2012. 2.- P. 103-109.
ZitaGomes, de Vanconcelos M. R., Lopes Gueralm., de Almedia A. B., De Carlos Felino C. Implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a controlled trial. // Biomed
Res Int. 2017. – 10. – P. 165–172.
Marco Annunzia, LuigiGuia. The effect of titanium surface modifications of dental implant osseointegration. // Frnt Oral. 2015. – P. 62–67.
MohanadAl-Sabbagh, WaliedEldomiaty. YasserKhabbaz. Can osseointegration be without primary stability? // Dent Clin Noeth Arm. 2019. – 63(3). – P. 461–463
Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, et al. Effect of implant thread geometry on secondary stability, bone density, and bone-to-implant contact: a biomechanical and
histological analysis. // Implant Dent. 2015. – 24. – P. 384–391.
Strub JR, Judzik BA, Tuna T. Prognosis of immediately loaded implants and their restorations: a systematic literature review. // J Oral Rehabil. 2012. – 39. – P. 704–717.
Atieh MA, Alsabeeha MHM, Payne AGT. Can resonance frequency analysis predict failure risk of immediately loaded implants? // Int J Prostodont. 2012. – 25. – P.326–339.
Bogaerde LV, Pedretti G, Sennerby L, et al. Immediate / early function of Neoss implant splacedinmaxillas and posterior mandibles: an 18- month prospective
case series study. // Clin Implant Dent Relat Res .2010. – 12. – P. 83–94.
Makovic A, Calvo-Guirado JL, Lazic Z, et al. Evaluation of primary stability of self-tapping and non-self-tapping dental implants. A 12 - week clinical study. // Clin
Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013. – 15. P. 341–349.
Xing Yin, Jingtao Li, Waldemar Hoffman, Angelines Gasser, et al. Mechanical and biological advantages of tri -oval implant design. // J Clin Med. 2019. – 28. –
(4). – P. 427–436.
Mariano Herrero – Climent, Manuel M.RomeroRuits, Pedro LazaroCalvo et al. Effectiness of new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric
comparative study in minipigs. // Clin Oral Investng. 2018. – 22(3). – P. 143–1432.
Macary C, Menhall A, Zammarie C, Lombardi T, et al. Primary stability optimization by using fixtures with different thread depth loading implants. // Materials
(Basel). 2019. – 27. – 12(15). – P.398–411.
Jinno Y, Jimbo R, Tovar N, Taixeira HS, et al. In vivo evaluation of dual acid- etched implants with identical microgeometry in high -density bone. // Implants Dent.
– 26. – P. 815–819.
Rittel ID., Dorogoy A., Shemtov-Yona K. Modeling the effect of osseointegration on dental implants pullout and torque removal tests. // Clinical Implant Dentistry
and Relate Research. 2018. – 86(2051). – P. 713–720.
GaetanoMarenzi, GlanricoSpagnuolo, JoneAmillaSammartino, et al. Micro- scae surface patterning of titanium dental implants by anodization in the presence of
modifying salts. // Materials (Basel). 2019. – 12 (11). – P. 1753–1764.
Mello CC, Lemos SA, Verri FR, Dos Santos DM et al. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets versus delayed implants into healed sockets: a
systematic review and meta – analysis. // Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017. – 26(9). – P.1162–1177.
Pigozo MN, Rebelo da Costa T, Sesma N, Lagana DC. Immediate versus early loading of single dental implants: a systematic review and analisis. // J Prosthet
Dent. 2018. – 120(1). P. 25–34.
Bunev FA, Muraev AA, Hazhva YuV, Mukhametshyn RV y dr. Rezultatы neposredstvennoi dentalnoi ymplantatsyy s nemedlennoi nahruzkoi y obosnovanye protokola mate
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
