Application of CAD/CAM Systems in the Fabrication of Bar-Supported Structures on Dental Implants

Authors

  • Rufat Huseynli Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2025-6-135

Keywords:

implant-supported bar structure, CAD/CAM, titanium alloy, cobalt–chromium alloy

Abstract

The use of CAD/CAM technology in the fabrication of bar-supported implant structures provides exceptionally high precision (up to 5 μm compared to 50–70 μm in casting), ensuring ideal fit, reducing production time (to as little as one day), and enabling the creation of complex, customized designs from high-strength materials (such as zirconia) that consider anatomy and biocompatibility. This approach minimizes the risk of peri-implantitis and ensures superior aesthetics and functionality that are unattainable with traditional methods.
For cast bar-supported implant structures, the microgap between the implant and the prosthetic structure is 390 ± 70 μm for cobalt–chromium alloy and 800 ± 40 μm for titanium alloy, which necessitates the use of additional corrective technologies. To improve the accuracy of implant-supported bar structures, CAD/CAM milling from solid blocks of various materials is employed.
The study aimed to evaluate the precision of CAD/CAM-milled bar structures supported by dental implants used in prosthetic treatment, as a function of the material employed and the number of supporting implants.
Materials and methods. A total of 20 patients were examined, including 12 women and 8 men aged from 35 to 77 years, all of whom had 4 or 6 dental implants previously placed in the mandible. Using CAD/CAM systems and 5-axis milling machines, 20-bar constructs supported by 4 or 6 implants were fabricated from either titanium or cobalt–chromium alloy. The total number of supporting implants was 100.
Conclusions. Based on the data obtained in the course of the study, the following clinical recommendations can be formulated for the fabrication of implant-supported bar constructions:
1. Both titanium and cobalt-chromium alloys may be used as suitable materials.
2. In prosthetic treatment supported by either 4 or 6 dental implants, CAD/CAM milling enables the fabrication of high-precision constructions.
3. CAD/CAM milling allows for the production of constructions with consistently acceptable accuracy.
Thus, the fabrication of implant-supported bar constructions using 5-axis milling machines is recommended as the method of choice for the prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with complete edentulism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rufat Huseynli, Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan

Doctor of Philosophy in Medicine Associate Professor Department of Prosthodontics

References

Maher S. Hajjaj (2025). Implant-supported overdenture using a CAD/CAM-milled bar and locator attachments: a technical and case report. The Open Dentistry Journal, 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106391468250623095839

Yiğit E., et al. (2025). Fit analysis of implant-supported Co–Cr bars fabricated using different computer-aided manufacturing techniques. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 17(4): 210–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2025.17.4.210

Chappuis-Chocano, A. P., Sandrini Venante H. et al. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical performance of implant-supported overdentures retained by CAD/CAM bars. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 31.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0054

Pozzi, A., et al. (2016). Four-implant overdenture fully supported by a CAD/CAM titanium bar: a prospective 1-year study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116(4): 516–523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.015

Jaafar Abduo. (2014). Fit of CAD/CAM implant frameworks: a comprehensive review. Journal of Oral Implantology, 40(6), 758–766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00117

Sebastian Berthold Maximilian Patzelt, Benedikt C. Spies, & Ralf J. Kohal. (2015). CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported restorations: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(11): 77–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12633

Deeban, Y. (2024). Effectiveness of CAD/CAM-milled versus DMLS titanium implant frameworks. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 15(12): 376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15120376

Corsalini M., et al. (2017). Maxillary overdenture retained with an implant-supported CAD/CAM bar: 4-year follow-up. Bentham Open Medicine, 11: 247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010247

Alenezi, A., et al. (2022). Effect of full-arch two scanning techniques on the accuracy of overdentures: conventional and CAD/CAM Co–Cr bars. The Saudi Dental Journal, 34(7), 553–564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.08.007

Downloads

Published

2026-02-02

How to Cite

Huseynli, R. (2026). Application of CAD/CAM Systems in the Fabrication of Bar-Supported Structures on Dental Implants. Actual Dentistry, (6), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2025-6-135

Issue

Section

IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHODONTICS