Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of dental implants in patients with atrophy of the jaw bones with short implants and longer implants

Authors

  • Гагик Акопян Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения
  • А. Бояджян Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения.
  • А. Джилажян Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения
  • Н. Гамбарян Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения
  • В. Сейранян Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения
  • С. Геворгян Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения
  • А. Хачатрян Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2021-3-44

Keywords:

atrophy of the jaw bones, dental implantation, short implants

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the survival rate of dental implants with short implants (< 8 mm) and longer implants ( 8 mm) in patients with atrophy of the jaw bones.
Materials and research methods. This study is based on the analysis of treatment outcomes in 107 patients, 59 of whom received short implants (< 8 mm) and 48 patients received implants ( 8 mm) using a combination of augmentation. The study determined the engraftment of 5–6 mm Bicon implants and compared it with that of other implant sizes:
Results. The average loss of marginal bone after one year was 0.96±0.25 mm for short implants and 0.94±0.46 for long implants. The survival rate of short implants (6–8 mm) after 3 years was 97.8 %, the survival rate of long (10–13 mm) implants was 98.1 %. The patients were satisfied with the aesthetic and functional result of the treatment. The results showed that implantation using short ones is effective in improving the chewing ability of patients in patients with atrophy of the jaw bones. In difficult clinical conditions, with a pronounced bone tissue deficiency, the use of short implants is the most gentle surgical method for restoring the missing support of fixed prostheses.
Key words: atrophy of the jaw bones, dental implantation, short implants.

Author Biographies

Гагик Акопян , Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения


Акопян Гагик – д-р мед. наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой хирургической стоматологии и челюстно-лицевой хирургии Ереванского Государственного медицинского университета им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения. Адрес: ул. Корюна, 2, 0025, Ереван, Армения. Тел.: (+374) 91 403038. E-mail: hakobyan_gv@rambler.ru

 

А. Бояджян, Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения.

А. Бояджян – Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения.

А. Джилажян, Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения

А. Джилажян – Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения.

Н. Гамбарян, Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения

Н. Гамбарян – Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения.

В. Сейранян, Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения

В. Сейранян – Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения.

С. Геворгян, Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения

С. Геворгян – Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения.

А. Хачатрян, Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения

А. Хачатрян – Ереванский Государственный медицинский университет им. М. Гераци, Республика Армения.

References

Å. Leonhardt, K. Gröndahl, C. Bergström and U. Lekholm. Long-term follow-up of osseointegrated titanium implants using clinical, radiographic and microbiological

parameters // Clinical Oral Implants Research. – 2002. – Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 127–132.

Bataineh AB, Al-Dakes AM. The influence of length of implant on primary stability: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis // J. Clin. Exp. Dent. – 2017;

: 1–6.

Smbatian BS. Vosstanovlenye kostnoi tkany pry lechenyy patsyentov s yspolzovanyem stomatolohycheskykh ymplantatov razlychnыkh klynycheskykh sytuatsyiakh:

Dys. d-ra med. nauk. – Moskva, 2012.

Korolev VM. Klynyko-renthenolohycheskoe obosnovanye vыbora y yspolzovanye kostnыkh autotransplantatov pry dentalnoi ymplantatsyy: Dys. kand. med. nauk. –

Moskva, 2006.

Zheleznыi SP. Ortopedycheskaia reabylytatsyia bolnыkh na dentalnыkh ymplantatakh pry kostnoi plastyke cheliustei: Avtoref. dys. d-ra med. nauk. – Omsk, 2009.

Zubrylyn EV, Zheleznaia YuK, Rusakova EIu. Kompleksnaia reabylytatsyia bolnыkh posle kostno-plastycheskykh y kostno-rekonstruktyvnыkh operatsyi na cheliustno-

lytsevoi oblasty // Tykhookeanskyi medytsynskyi zhurnal. – 2013, № 1. – S. 70–72.

Alfaro FЭ. Kostnaia plastyka v stomatolohycheskoi ymplantolohyy. Opysanye metodyk y ykh klynycheskoho prymenenyia. – Moskva, 2006, 236 s.

Goyal M et al. Ridge augmentation in implant dentistry / Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization. – 2015, Sup. 1. – Vol. 7, p. 95–112.

Harshakumar K et al. Alveolar Ridge Augmentation using Autogenous Block Bone Grafts Harvested from Mandibular Ramus to Facilitate Implant Placement: A Case

Report / International Journal of Scientific Study. – 2014. – Vol. 2, Issue 1, p. 46–50.

Granizo RM. Rehabilitation with dental implants after mandibular reconstruction with microvascular fibula flap with previous osteoradionecrosis // Journal of Dental

Implants. – 2017. – Vol. 7, Issue 1, p. 33–38.

George N et al. Horisontal Ridge Augmentation // An Overview Annals of Dental Specialty. – 2016. –Vol. 4, Issue 2, p. 29–32.

Gaggl A, Bȕrger H, Virnik S, Schachner P. The Microvascular Corticocancellous Femur Flap for Reconstruction of the Anterior Maxilla in Adult Cleft Lip, Palate,

and Alveolus Patients // Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal. – 2012. – Vol. 49, N. 3, p. 305–312.

Kan JY, Lozada J.L. et al. Endosseous implant placement in conjunction with inferior alveolar nerve transposition: an evaluation of neurosensory disturbance //

Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. – 1997, 12 (4), p. 463–471.

Jensen ST, Nielsen HB. Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Partially Edentulous Atrophic Posterior Mandible with Short Implants (≤ 8 mm) Compared with the Sandwich

Osteotomy and Delayed Placement of Standard Length Implants (> 8 mm): a Systematic Review J. Oral Maxillofac Res. – 2018, vol. 9, No 2, p. 1–18.

Kuchler U et al. Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in Conjunction with or Prior to Implant Placement in the Anterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review // The International

Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. – 2014, Volume 29, Suppl. 6, p. 14–24.

Koudriavtsev TV et al. Prosthetic challenges in a free fibula flap mandibular reconstruction: A 10-year follow‑up of a case // Jour. of Dent. Impl. – 2017, Vol. 7,

Issue 2, p. 64–69.

Laino L et al. Vertical Ridge Augmentation of the Atrophic Posterior Mandible with Sandwich Technique: Bone Block from the Chin Area versus Corticocancellous

Bone Block Allograft. Clinical and Histological Prospective Randomized Controlled Study // International BioMed. Research. – 2014, Article ID 982104, 7 pages.

Ogunlade SO et al. Autogenous Corticocancellous Iliac Bone Graft in Reconstruction of Mandibula // Afr. J. Biomed. Res. – 2010, 13, p. 157–160.

O’Connell JE et al. Maxillary reconstruction using zygomatic implants a report of two cases. Journal of the Irish Dental Association. – 2011, 57 (3), p. 146–155.

Pimentel A et al. Lateralization Technique and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Transposition / Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Dentistry Volume 2016, Article

ID 4802637, 10 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4802637.

Pisoni L, Lucchi A et al. Sinus lift: 3 years follow up comparing autogenous bone block versus autogenous particulated grafts // Journal of Dent. Sci. – 11, 2016, p. 231–237.

Scipioni A, Bruschi G B, Calesini G. The edentulous ridge expansion technique: a five-year study // Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. – 1994, 14 (5), p. 451–459.

Tatum H. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstruction // Dent. Clin. North America. – 1986, N. 30, p. 207–229.

Tang YL. Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study //

Clin. Oral Impl. Res. – 2015, 26, p. 204–211.

Tian W at al. Retrospective Analysis of Vascularised Free Fibula Grafts in Oromandibular Reconstruction and Dental Rehabilitation following Resection of Ameloblastoma //

Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare. – 2014. – Vol. 23, N 1, p. 42–52.

Tolstunov L Hicke B. Horizontal Augmentation Through the Ridge-Split Procedure: A Predictable Surgical Modality in Implant Reconstruct // J. Oral Imp. – 2013. –

Vol. 39, N 1, p. 59–68.

Annibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell’Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: A systematic review // J. Dent. Res. – 2012, 91, 25–32.

Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone // J. Periodontology. – 2014, 66; 72–96.

Thoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, Garcia A, Schincaglia GP, Hдmmerle CHF. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer

dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: Demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading // J. Clin.

Periodontol. – 2015; 42; 72–8.

Peixoto HE, Camati PR, Faot F, Sotto-Maior BS, Martinez EF, Peruzzo DC. // Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. – 2017; 1; 80: 122–128.

Published

2021-10-22

Issue

Section

IMPLANTOLOGY