Adhesive photocomposite prosthese – option of restoration of dental row defect in the frontal area (clinical case report)

Authors

  • Юрий Александрович Мочалов
  • Ольга Павловна Голинка

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2021-2-20

Keywords:

teeth, defect, composite, adhesion, fiberglass

Abstract

Summary. Having and maintaining a smile aesthetic is an essential component of modern popular culture. Adhesive bridges («Maryland bridge») have been developed to eliminate single included defects in the dentition in the frontal areas, without preparing the supporting teeth. In modern conditions this technology is the method of choice since single defects in the anterior part of the dentition can also be eliminated through orthodontic treatment, manufacturing of a partially removable plate prosthesis, a traditional dental bridges, the manufacturing of cantilever orthopedic structures and prosthetics based on a dental implant. Adhesive dentures are a relatively new dental technology (which is on the border of orthopedic and therapeutic dentistry) the first work in this direction was carried out in the early 80s of the twentieth century. Modern adhesive bridges are divided into two large groups – solid metal and photopolymer (composite) which prevail in practice. The optimal form of the release of the reinforcing element which combines a slight preparation of abutment teeth to a safe depth, high physical and mechanical properties, simple achievement of the anatomical shape of the teeth in the bridge structures of the anterior and posterior teeth is fiberglass in the form of ribbons 2 mm wide, up to 0.5 mm (this is the most effective width and thickness for clinical practice) and braided type. Using adhesive bridges, it is possible to optimally restore the aesthetics of the anterior part of the dentition in one visit without preliminary preparation of adjacent teeth. An example of the manufacture of a photocomposite adhesive prosthesis reinforced with glass fiber for the restoration of a single included defect in the dentition in the frontal area using domestically produced materials is given.
Key words: teeth, defect, composite, adhesion, fiberglass.

Author Biographies

Юрий Александрович Мочалов

Мочалов Юрий Александрович – д-р мед. наук, доцент кафедры хирургической стоматологии, челюстно лицевой хирургии и онкостоматологии ГВУЗ «Ужгородский национальный университет».
Почтовый адрес: 88015, г. Ужгород, ул. Университетская, 16-А.
Тел.: + 38 (067) 994-37-73. E-mail: u.mochalov@gmail.com.

Ольга Павловна Голинка

Голинка Ольга Павловна – врач-стоматолог. Салон красоты «Энигма», г. Киев.
Тел.: + 38 (050) 414-60-14. E-mail: Golinka21@gmail.com.

References

1. Thompson VP. Whence the Maryland Bridge? The evolution of the adhesive bridge // Dent Hist. – 2017, Jan.; 62 (1): 9–14.
2. Balasubramaniam GR. Predictability of resin bonded bridges – a systematic review // Br. Dent J. – 2017; 222 (11): 849–58. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.497.
3. Poloneychik NM, Myishkovets NA. Adgezivnyie mostovidnyie protezyi. Minsk: BGMU; 2004. 16 p. [In Russian]
4. Abaev ZM, Severina LA. Primenenie adgezivnovolokonnyih konstruktsiy dlya vosstanovleniya vklyuchennyih defektov zubnogo ryada // Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy
zhurnal. – 2016; 20 (2): 106–10. [In Russian].
5. Trush N. Zubnaya moda narodov mira.URL:http://www.vokrugsveta.ru/ article/279269/ [date of access: 08.12.2020] [In Russian]
6. Grinko IA. Iskusstvennyie izmeneniya tela v sisteme sotsio-kulturnyih simvolov traditsionnyih obschestv [avtorefer diss]. M.; 2006. 27 p. [In Russian]
7. Gasser TJW, Balmer M, Hämmerle CHF. Zahnverlust in der modernen Zahnmedizin – was jetzt? Praxis (Bern 1994). 2019; 108 (5): 315–20. doi:
10.1024/1661-8157/a003210.
8. Radlinskiy S. Adgezivnyie mostovidnyie konstruktsii // DentArt. 1998; 2: 28–40 [In Russian]
9. Dvornikova TS. Volokonnoe armirovanie v povsednevnoy klinicheskoy praktike. Chast II. Sozdanie adgezivnyih mostovidnyih protezov. Institut stomatologii. 2009;
4: 38–41 [In Russian].
10. Tezulas E, Yildiz C, Evren B, Ozkan Y. Clinical procedures, designs, and survival rates of all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region:
A systematic review // J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. – 2018; 30 (4): 307–18. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12389.
11. Udod A.A., Dramaretskaya S.I. Adgezivnyie mostovidnyie protezyi: sovremennyie tendentsii i podhodyi // Visnik problem biologiyi i meditsiny. – 2011; 1: 27–31
[In Russian]
12. Tacir IH, Dirihan RS, Polat ZS, Salman GÖ, Vallittu P, Lassila L, Ayna E. Comparison of Load-Bearing Capacities of 3-Unit Fiber-Reinforced Composite Adhesive
Bridges with Different Framework Designs // Med. Sci Monit. – 2018; 24: 4440–8. doi: 10.12659/MSM.909271.
13. Udod AA, Dramaretskaya SI. Klinicheskoe issledovanie adgezivnyih mostovidnyih protezov, izgotovlennyih pri razlichnyih podhodah k preparirovaniyu opornyih
zubov // Visnik problem biologiyi i meditsiny. – 2014; 3(3): 329–32 [In Russian].

Published

2021-06-15

Issue

Section

PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY