Evaluation of the effectiveness of dental implants with the use of 3D programming software and surgical guided

Authors

  • Г. Акопян
  • Л. Ессаян
  • Г. Хачатрян
  • А. Хачатрян
  • Т. Киямова
  • Л. Гюламиряан
  • И. Газазян

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2020-4-38

Keywords:

Dental implants, guided surgery, surgical guide, 3D printed guides, errors and complications of dental implantation

Abstract

Background. The use of modern digital technologies significantly changes the classical approaches to planning and conducting dental implantation. The whole process can be accomplished performed thus, so that the ideal placement of the implant can be achieved without the injured anatomical structure.
Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of dental implant placement with the use of 3D-modeling and surgical guided.
Materials and methods. A total of 148 patients with ridge defects in age group were selected for the study. All patients had a partially or totally edentulous. Computer scans, three-dimensional computer modeling were used to plan operations. 2 Patient groups were formed to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment using 3D modeling and surgical guided.
Patients were included in group I, at the planning stage only a CT scan was used, Group II included patients who underwent a CT scan, 3D computer modeling (3 Shape Implant Studio) during the planning phase, and surgical guided (were fabricated with a desktop 3D printer Stratasys), were used in the surgical phase, the dental defect was restored with the with implant insertion.
Results. In Group I, intraoperative or immediate post-operative complications were noted (errors in the position, inclination), anatomical risk structures were invaded, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 96.2 %. In Group II, no intra-operative or immediate post-operative complications were noted (no errors in the position, inclination,), no anatomical risk structures, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 97.6 %.
Conclusion. The 3D modeling method and the use of surgical guided for dental implantation significantly risk the complications. Implant placement through the precision surgical guide is more accurate than freehand placement into the osteotomy, the guides allow installation of dental implants in the most optimal position for future prosthetic work, depth, and inclination.
Key words: Dental implants, guided surgery, surgical guide, 3D printed guides, errors and complications of dental implantation.

Author Biographies

Г. Акопян

Г. Акопян – заведующий кафедрой хирургической стоматологии и челюстно-лицевой хирургии
Ереванского Государственного медицинского университета, Республика Армения.
Адрес: ул. Корюна 2, 0025, Ереван, Армения. Тел.: (+374) 91 403038. E-mail: hakobyan_gv@rambler.ru.

Л. Ессаян

Л. Ессаян – профессор, д-р мед. наук, заведующий кафедрой терапии
Ереванского Государственного медицинского университета, Республика Армения.

Г. Хачатрян

Г. Хачатрян – отдел постдипломного образования
Ереванского Государственного медицинского университета, Республика Армения.

А. Хачатрян

А. Хачатрян – Минздрав Республики Армения.

Т. Киямова

Т. Киямова – Немецкий имплантологический центр, Москва, РФ.

Л. Гюламиряан

Л. Гюламиряан – резидент Ереванского Государственного медицинского университета, Республика Армения.

И. Газазян

И. Газазян – Клиника «Ин Дент», Ереван, Республика Армения

References

1. Truab D. Surgical complications related to implant surgery. N M Dent J. 1997;48(1):16–7.
2. Garg AK. Complications associated with implant surgical procedures part 1: prevention. Dent Implantol Update. 2004;1 5(4): 25–32.
3. Misch K, Wang H. L. Implant surgery complications: etiology and treatment. Implant Dent. 2008; 17(2): 159–68.
4. Froum S. Dental Implant Complications, Etiology, Prevention and Treatment. 2010, Book
5. Shavit I, Juodzbalys G. Inferior alveolar nerve injuries following implant. Placement Importance of early diagnosis and treatment: A systematic review. J. Oral
Maxillofac. Res. 2014; 5: e2.
6. Scarano A, Sinjari B, Murmura G, Lorusso F. Neurosensory Disturbance of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve After 3025 Implant Placements. Implant Dent 2017; 26: 735–74
7. Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery: A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 305–13
8. Mohammed Jasim Al-Juboori, Shaifulizan Ab Rahman, Akram Hassan, Ikmal Hisham Bin Ismail, Omar Farouq Tawfiq. What is the effect of initial implant position
on the crestal bone level in flap and flapless technique during healing period? J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2013; 43(4): 153–159
9. Luca Ramaglia et al. Implant angulation: 2-year retrospective analysis on the influence of dental implant angle insertion on marginal bone resorption in maxillary
and mandibul osseous onlay grafts.Clinical Oral Investigations. 2015; 19: 769–779
10. Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: A systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications,
and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral MaxIllofac Implants. 2014; 29: 55–77
11. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of Implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003; 31 (11): 825–33.
12. Kola MZ, et al. Surgical templates for dental implant positioning; current knowledge and clinical perspectives. Niger J Surg 2015; 21(1): 1–5.
13. Ramasamy M, Raja GR, Karthik S, Narendrakumar. R. Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013; 5(1): 98–102
14. Kola MZ, et al. Surgical templates for dental implant positioning; current knowledgeand clinical perspectives. Niger J Surg 2015; 21(1): 1–5
15. M, Raja GR, Karthik S, Narendrakumar. R. Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013; 5(1): 98–102
16. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Kдrcher H, Navigational precision of drilling tools preventing damage to the mandibular canal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001;29:271-5g
17. Holst, S., Blatz, M.B., Eitner, S. Precision for computer-guided implant placement: using 3D planning software and fixed intraoral reference points. J. Oral. Maxil.
Surg. 65 (3), 393–399
18. Farley NE, Kennedy K, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer generated and conventional surgical guides.Int. J.Oral
Maxillofac. Implants 2013; 28: 563–72
19. Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26(l): 69–76
20. Hakobyan G, Hakobyan D, Samadbin N. Clinical Effectiveness of Guided Implant Surgery. The Journal of Implant & Advanced Clinical Dentistry 2019; 11(2): 6–14
21. D’haese, J., Van De Velde, T., Komiyama, A., Hultin,M., De Bruyn, H.: Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides
fororal rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin. Implant.Dent. R.2012; 14(3), 321–335

Published

2020-10-15

Issue

Section

IMPLANTOLOGY